There’s at least one milestone Tiger Woods hasn’t achieved just yet: turning 50. But that’s about to change. On Dec. 30, Woods will hit the half-century mark, an occasion we’re honoring here at GOLF.com by way of nine days of Tiger coverage that will not only pay homage to his staggering career achievements but also look forward to what might be coming next for a transformational player whose impact on the game cannot be measured merely by wins or earnings or even major titles. In our first “Tiger @ 50” entry (below), James Colgan investigates the fabled and far-reaching “Tiger Effect.”
***
The final round of the 1997 Masters began with a prophecy.
“There’s a new era about to dawn on the most magical setting in golf,” Jim Nantz said, his voice set under a shot of the flowering azaleas of Amen Corner. “Today, all of Augusta’s records are in danger, as 21-year-old Tiger Woods is poised to make history in the final round of the Masters.”
Nantz’s line might have sounded like hyperbole to those watching from their living rooms that spring, but we know today that it was one of the understatements of Nantz’s career. A new era was dawning at Augusta National … and everywhere else in golf. A bolt of lightning was preparing to jolt the game as we knew it, and his name was Tiger Woods.
By the time the sun rose over a gloomy Augusta National on that Masters Sunday, talk of Woods’ record-setting dominance largely had been contained to the golf course. Woods held a nine-shot lead at the tournament’s 54-hole mark, good enough to tie the tournament record with 18 holes still to play. But back at the CBS Sports compound, whispers had started about the records in play far beyond Augusta, Ga.
“It was really all that anybody in the world was talking about on Saturday night,” Sean McManus, then in his first year as chairman of CBS Sports, told me last year. “I was totally nervous we were going to screw something up.”
McManus knew intuitively what the rest of the world needed days to figure out: Tiger Woods was a magnet. His story, his age, his stupefying talent, his trademark red shirt, his mighty lash of a swing — all of it entranced the sports world in a Dave Loggins-orchestrated siren song. Nobody could look away, and if that was true, then McManus was in for a good weekend.
But as it turned out, McManus was wrong. He wasn’t in for a good weekend. Not even close.
He was in for the best weekend of his golf life. Woods’ Sunday coronation at Augusta National — a 12-shot, record-setting, sport-reorienting, planet-shaking victory — became the most-watched golf telecast in history, with 22 million average viewers tuning in to see Woods lap the field en route to the green jacket.
Nobody could believe the numbers when they first arrived, but nobody needed much time to figure out what they meant, either: a transformational star had arrived in golf. Every TV network, every major corporation with sponsorship dollars and, yes, every sports fan on earth suddenly wanted a piece of golf. The strange phenomenon of Sunday’s viewership explosion at the Masters was only the beginning. The Tiger Effect was upon us.
The Tiger Effect, quantified
The nearly three decades that have followed Tiger Woods since that Sunday have charted the course of modern golf history: 82 professional wins, 15 major titles, a dozen sport-changing moments, a handful of unthinkable stumbles and one of the improbable comebacks the sports world has ever seen.
But over time, perhaps the best evidence of Tiger Woods’ greatness has been reduced to a phrase — a three-word rejoinder used to explain the transformative role Woods played in the business of golf: the Tiger Effect.
What is this phenomenon? It has many meanings … and one bottom line: cash. In honor of Woods’ 50th birthday, I wanted to see if I could parse through the clichés to calculate the dollars and cents Woods organically brought into pro golf.
What I found is that the financial significance of Tiger Woods is both overwhelming and impressively slippery. The Tiger Effect can be measured in sponsorship dollars — more than 90 percent of Woods’ estimated $1.3 billion net worth is tied to revenue sources other than his $121 million in on-course earnings. It can be measured in tournament purses, which Woods helped double twice in his heyday. It can be measured in golf’s TV ratings, which exploded throughout Woods’ career and still spike with his appearances today (ask the PNC Championship, which desperately missed Tiger and his son, Charlie, last week). And, yes, it can even be measured in the pockets of his opponents, who sat downstream of Woods’ greatness and, according to one analysis, more than doubled their earnings as a result.
So, what does it all amount to? Let’s start with the easy stuff: the Tiger Effect as measured in Tiger’s own bank account.
Tiger, Inc.
Even among mega-rich superstar athletes, Tiger Woods is in rarefied air.
According to Forbes, Woods is one of only three billionaire athletes ever, alongside Michael Jordan and LeBron James. There are many ways of subdividing Woods’ vast wealth — his compound in Jupiter, Fla.; his jet; his yacht (famously named Privacy); his sprawling tentacles of business interests, including a new clothing line named Sun Day Red — the vast majority of which has come from his off-course pursuits. According to the PGA Tour, Woods’ career on-course earnings are $120,999,126, or just 9.3 percent of his overall net worth.
As for the rest of his wealth? The bulk of it comes from his sponsorships, including Nike, whose 27-year relationship with Woods paid him approximately $500 million, according to estimates based on reported contract details. While Woods’ Nike partnership ended in 2024, he still collects annual checks from other sponsors like TaylorMade, Bridgestone, Monster Energy, 2K Sports and Rolex, and draws revenue from investments like Sun Day Red; TGR Design, his burgeoning golf course design firm; TMRW Sports, the investment group behind the TGL, and more.
And though he has recorded only a handful of starts over the last few years, Woods hasn’t stopped collecting from the PGA Tour, either. He received a $100 million equity payment as part of the Tour’s new player equity program in 2024, and has pocketed approximately $45 million from the Player Impact Program — an initiative designed to pay PGA Tour players based on their popularity, which Woods won each year of its existence despite rarely competing. (According to tax filings, Woods also pocketed nearly $30 million in compensation from the PGA Tour in 2024 for his roles on various boards.)
“All of sport — and all of sports business — hinges on heroes and champions,” says Rick Burton, a professor of sports marketing at Syracuse University. “Fan avidity is driven by something [Nike Founder Phil Knight] said one time: We want to see the impossible made real.”
Woods’ $45 million paycheck for being famous certainly fits the “impossible made real” category, but even addressing his money in plain terms sells the full story short. Perhaps the most overlooked slice of Woods’ fortune is the soft power it has allowed him to wield in the late stages of his playing career. In 2022, Woods declined what would have amounted to the largest contract in pro sports history — a reported “high nine-figures” offer from LIV CEO Greg Norman that solidified the Tour’s upper hand even as LIV poured billions into the golf landscape. Meanwhile, Woods’ foundation, which helps children in low-income communities, crossed the $1 billion revenue threshold in 2023, according to Money in Sport.
“Tiger transcended the sport in the ways that Michael Jordan did,” Burton said. “He became bigger than the game itself. He became pop culture. Everyone everywhere wondered what Tiger was up to, not only his success on the course, but in everything he did. The impact of that was massive.”
The ‘new era’ in golf
A decade ago, a researcher named Roger Pielke had an idea.
He wanted to figure out how much money Tiger Woods had earned … for his opponents.
It is, of course, difficult to quantify the effect of one great player on a sport, but Pielke thought he had a winning strategy. He calculated the rate of purse increases over the years preceding Woods’ arrival in golf, and then he calculated the rate of purse increases in the decade following Woods’ arrival. If golf wanted to understand “the Tiger Effect,” the easiest way was to follow the money.
What Pielke found was astonishing: PGA Tour payouts increased at a rate three times as fast in the Tiger Woods era as in the era preceding it. Over the course of a decade, Woods had more than doubled the size of his opponents’ earnings … and won nearly $100 million on the course himself.
Pielke’s findings were widely publicized at the time, particularly his assertion that Woods’ rise correlated with an extra $30 million in the pockets of rivals Phil Mickelson and Vijay Singh, but they didn’t address the market forces causing the spike in earnings: TV ratings.
According to an analysis of publicly available TV ratings reviewed by GOLF.com, Woods didn’t just move the TV ratings needle — he bent it. Compared with events he didn’t play, Woods’ participation drove viewership increases of at least 60 percent in 20 of his 22 professional seasons (excluding only his injury-shortened 2014 and 2020 campaigns). During his peak years, the numbers were even more staggering: events he competed in delivered twice as much viewership as those he didn’t in seven of his first 14 seasons, and three times as much viewership during his epic 2008 season. Put simply, for more than half of his prime, Woods’ presence at a tournament meant twice as many people watching.
These shifts correlated with enormous downstream changes in the economics of golf, where the price of TV rights agreements multiplied twice in the early stages of Woods’ career — and where total PGA Tour prize money multiplied right along with it. According to statements from former PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem and a GOLF.com analysis of PGA Tour purse sizes, total PGA Tour prize money ballooned from $70 million in 1996 (pre-Tiger) to $135 million in 1999, and doubled again to roughly $280 million in 2008. (Total PGA Tour prize money doubled a fourth time in the Tiger Era in 2025, jumping to at least $565 million.)
These changes altered the mechanics of professional golf, and also altered golf’s standing in the greater sports hierarchy. For the first time, golf proved it could grow at rates comparable to other major sports leagues, which allowed the sport to grow its TV contracts (and, by extension, its prize funds) accordingly.
Tiger’s impact on TV was felt during his time away from golf in the mid-2010s, when his absence from the sport resulted in an 18-percent ratings drop between 2013 and 2018.
“In our business plan, we did not assume any golfer was going to be as dominant as Tiger had been in the past,” former CBS chairman Sean McManus said on the day he signed a modest TV rights expansion with the PGA Tour in 2011, a nod to the role Woods had played in previous TV rights negotiations.
In the end, Pielke estimated the Tiger Effect had collectively helped players earn an extra $1.6 billion in prize money — to say nothing of the untold sums offered in endorsement deals and sponsorships.
In 2021, a quarter-century after Woods’ debut, Rory McIlroy summarized Tiger’s importance to the sport rather nicely:
“We should pay tribute to him every day for being on the PGA Tour and what he’s done for golf.”
‘A win for the ages!’
By the time Woods approached the 18th green on Masters Sunday 1997, Jim Nantz’s prophecy had come to fruition.
Woods had a 12-shot lead, the largest in Masters history. He was just 21 years old, the youngest winner in Masters history. He was, by his birthright, the first Black, Asian and mixed-race player to win the green jacket. A new era in golf had arrived.
As Woods tapped in his two-putt to clinch the tournament and the record, Nantz delivered the punchline.
“A win for the ages!”
It was a fitting sentiment, and not only for Woods. On that Sunday in Augusta, Ga., Woods flipped an entire sport on its head — welcoming scores of new fans, a generation of new players and a new playbook in the economics of the rock and stick.
The palpable effect of those changes is felt every day in professional golf. We see it in the creation of new tours, ever-larger TV contracts, a never-ending list of Fortune 100 sponsors and the generation of pros who will never know life with a winner’s check of less than $1 million.
But there also are ways Woods affected the game that will never find their way into a statistical analysis or Nielsen chart — changes too obvious to ignore and yet too subtle to measure. You can sense the Tiger Effect when you walk the range on Sunday at a big event and see the steely-eyed stares of the twentysomething stars of the next generation — the same twentysomethings who once watched Tiger dominate Sunday afternoons wearing the same impervious confidence.
You can see it in the number of world top-10 players still wearing a Nike swoosh, despite the company’s significantly reduced golf presence in the 2020s. You can understand by scanning the PGA Tour’s money list, which shows Woods’ net-positive effect on golf manifesting in today’s stars earning one-fifth of his career income in just a single season, as Scottie Scheffler did in 2025.
And you can feel it at your own local course, anywhere in the world, where golf just means something more than it did three decades ago. (The latest numbers from the National Golf Foundation back it up, finding that golf is currently welcoming the largest and most diverse group of players in its history.)
“I always joke with Tim Finchem, if it weren’t for Tiger, we wouldn’t be paying as much money as we were paying for TV rights,” McManus said. “But it’s true that if it weren’t for Tiger, we wouldn’t have all of this.”
In the end, maybe the best way to measure the Tiger Effect is to imagine golf without him.
And if you can’t?
Well, that might be the point.
You can reach the author at james.colgan@golf.com.
