Twenty years ago this month, Titleist launched its revolutionary, multi-layer Pro V1 balls to PGA Tour players at the Invensys Classic of Las Vegas. That week, an astounding 47 players switched to the new Pro V1 ball, including the Invensys Classic winner, Billy Andrade; not a bad start, and the momentum never let up. Since that week, Titleist’s Pro V1s have been widely recognized as the game’s best balls for 20 years.
The Pro V1 was special because it combined two different worlds that were previously separate. Before 2000, golfers had to choose between wound-core balls, which were soft and spun a lot so they were easy to control, and solid-core balls that offered more distance. The wound-core balls weren’t very long, and the solid-core balls didn’t feel or perform very well.
Then came the Pro V1 that offered the best of both worlds with its solid core construction (from Titleist’s distance balls), surlyn casing (from Titleist’s performance balls) and a 392-dimpled urethane cover. For professionals and amateurs alike, the formula worked.
Bryson DeChambeau might unveil his newest innovation ‘hopefully’ at the Masters
These days, Titleist pumps out 300,000 Pro V1 (and Pro V1x) balls per day in its 225,000-square-foot Titleist Ball Plant 3 facility in New Bedford, Mass. Today, it’s almost impossible to imagine the golf world without Pro V1 balls, but would you believe that some pros were initially skeptical of the product?
Fordie Pitts, who started working for Titleist in 1993 and is currently the Titleist tour consultant for golf ball R&D, remembers testing the early prototypes for the Pro V1 as far back as 1997, and it wasn’t an immediate home run.
“Those (wound) balls had a lot of spin and that’s how the game was being played at the time,” Pitts said. “Years prior to the launch in 2000, we had taken a solid-core product to the players and a lot of them were a little skeptical at first. The feel was a little bit different. The spin wasn’t as much. … I think the attitude back then was you needed spin and a lot of it.”
Early prototypes for the Pro V1 didn’t make much of a splash in the industry, and wound balls continued to prevail on Tour. Tiger Woods may have had a hand in changing that, though. Woods — who now uses a Bridgestone ball — famously switched to a solid-core Nike ball and dominated the 2000 U.S. Open. Players started to take notice, and realized they may have been mistaken about solid-core balls.
“Tiger came on the scene and was blowing it by everyone else and all of the sudden guys were like, ‘Wait a minute, let me rethink that product,’” Pitts said. “So we brought it back out again.”
While most pros were clamoring for the new Pro V1 during its official launch in 2000, there were still skeptics. A young Stewart Cink was one of them.
Cink had already won a few PGA Tour titles and he was comfortable using the wound-core Titleist Professional ball. While he finished T3 that week in the 2000 Invensys Classic, he acknowledges he missed the early train on the Pro V1.
How much longer is a modern golf ball than a wound ball? One Tour pro found out…
“I was not accustomed to the way that the Pro V1 launched so high and I was scared of it if it got windy,” Cink told GOLF.com. “They assured me that [the 2000 Pro V1 ball] spins less, so it goes through the wind better. And I was like, ‘Eh, I don’t buy that.’ It was just an era where we didn’t use Trackman; we didn’t have anything like that. We just used our own eyes and if it didn’t launch into a window that we were used to seeing, then it just wasn’t right. That [thinking] was just flawed. Now we have a lot more empirical information to go by that says, ‘That’s flawed.’”
Phil Mickelson (he finished second in the 2000 Invensys Classic), and who now plays Callaway balls, was an early adopter of the Pro V1 that first week in Vegas. He gave Cink a bit of prophetic wisdom.
“I played with Phil on Sunday and he had switched and I hadn’t,” Cink said. “I remember discussing it with Phil a little bit. He asked why I hadn’t switched, and he was like, ‘Man, you have to switch. This is the future.’
“He was right. I knew he was right. I just wasn’t quite ready to make a big switch. At the time I was a little bit more averse to change. Over the course of time I’ve become way less averse to making changes and basing more of my decisions on the empirical type data instead of what feels good and what emotionally I’m secure in. But I think that’s been a good change.”
Looking back on it, Cink says the launch of the Pro V1 was the moment where the still-relevant distance debate began.
“We can talk about drivers all day, shafts and athleticism and Trackman, but the golf ball was the really big factor that changed distance,” he said. “The Pro V1 was the biggest factor of the golf balls. It was the first time that really good players en masse switched over to a solid-core ball.
“Before that launch, a golfer had to decide which one of the holy grails of golf ball performance he or she wanted: distance, or feel and performance. Those were really the holy grails. There were other factors, too: durability and affordability, but as far as sheer performance and feel, you had to go wound, distance, you had to go solid.
“You had a ball [with the Pro V1] that was both of the holy grails of golf ball performance. Distance at the top of the industry, and feel and performance also at the top of the industry. It really unleashed the beast, and now we’re in the golf ball distance debate.”
Cink continued using a wound core ball after that week in Vegas, but the trend was catching on rapidly.
