What happens if the Presidents Cup ends in a tie?
After four days of captaincy and another several months of prognostication, the key to the end of this year’s Presidents Cup at Royal Melbourne could come thanks to a match Tiger Woods and Ernie Els played 15 years ago.
The Presidents Cup is uncommonly close after three days, with the International squad clinging to a two point lead, 10-8. In the tournament’s 25 year existence, it’s historically been one-sided in favor of the Americans, who hold a 10-1-1 record all-time.
The International team needs 5.5 points and the U.S. needs 7.5 to win the Presidents Cup.
— GOLF.com (@GOLF_com) December 14, 2019
Who will sink the winning putt? pic.twitter.com/tyRZCJcDVn
So, with things so closely contested, you might be wondering: what happens if both teams are knotted up after the conclusion of today’s 12 singles matches?
The answer can be traced back to the 2003 Presidents Cup from the Fancourt Resort in South Africa. In that tournament, the Sundays singles matches led to a deadlocked 17-17 tie. After the singles ended, 2019 Presidents Cup captains Woods and Els were selected by their respective teams to compete in a sudden death, winner-take-all match for the trophy.
After three sudden death holes, neither Els nor Woods had budged. With the sun setting in South Africa, tournament officials called the event a tie, with both the United States and the International team sharing the title.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the wake of that 2003 decision, tournament officials decided to make a formal shift to change the tournament rules. If the tournament is still deadlocked at the end of the Sunday singles matches, the event automatically ends in a tie, with both teams receiving a share of the trophy. In the eyes of the officials, if a winner hasn’t been declared after 30 matches, it’s most fair to give both teams a share of the victory.
Now, it’s difficult to envision a scenario in which a tie would be satisfying for either side after four days of high stakes, high intensity match-play golf. Over the span of the week at Royal Melbourne, we’ve seen a little bit of everything, from a physical altercation to a Terrell Owens impression. But given the quality of play seen from both sides, it’s hard to argue that either side doesn’t deserve a share of the trophy, if things do end in a tie.
To receive GOLF’s all-new newsletters, subscribe for free here.
ADVERTISEMENT